3 Reasons Why Push-Ups Are Better Than Bench Press For Chest Strength and Muscle Building.
1. Massive Core Activation
It is true that push-ups activate the core more than bench presses. That is because you need to keep a plank position and maintain that neutral spine curvature throughout the push-ups while on the bench press you are laying on your back.
“If you are doing weighted push-ups, then this effect becomes much, much more pronounced as any external weight that you add on to your back is directly working against your core,” Enkiri says.
Enkiri’s argument is that it doesn’t matter if you can bench press 400 pounds if your core, abs, lats, and everything in your torso cannot resist that force. That is what makes the push-up a more functional exercise than the bench press.
2. Shoulder Blades Can Move Freely
Bench presses have your shoulder blades pinned down against the bench, whereas on push-ups your shoulder blades are free to move. “This allows the scapula to retract and protract.”
A few benefits of this are allowing the serratus anterior to be targeted, it is a more natural way of utilising the shoulders and pressing.
3. Great Stimulus to Fatigue Ratio
Lastly, on the reasons why push-ups are better than bench press for chest strength and muscle building is exactly what sets them apart and that make many people choose the bench press: it is low volume.
Push-ups don’t tax your body as bench press does. Because of that, push-ups can be done for high volume or frequencies which allow for high-quality and easily recoverable work to be performed. For this reason, push-ups can be done as a finisher exercise to increase even further your chest gains.
And those are Alec Enkiri’s 3 reasons why push-ups are better than bench press for chest strength and muscle building. If you want to know more about his arguments, click on the video below.
Comments
Post a Comment